I'm wondering about this practise of transferring people with a case to another place. A dubious cop gets transferred to another station. A dubious teacher/headmaster/headmistress gets transferred to another school. An equally dubious government servant got transferred to another department. Why do we accept this practise?
1) They've made a mess here, let them make a mess somewhere else.
2) They've made a mess here, they can't make a mess somewhere else because they're not familiar with the ground.
Probably the rationale is in 2) but why the organization receiving this bad apple did not question it. Why do they deserve a cop or teacher/headmaster/headmistress, employee of a questionable character? Why do they have to live with such character among their untainted midst? Or probably it's an honor to be receiving this bad apple so they can prove to be able to turn him/her over.
This is really a big mystery to me.
The way I see it, these bad apples will take it out on innocent victims like the student and the public. They're angry they get caught. They're angry they got transferred. They're angry they can't do what they've done before. But on a positive note, probably some of these bad apples got a jolt they've been found out and will be afraid to do it again.
Unless it's something like this case where a superior uses his/her position to transfer someone for personal reason. Then all I can say, it's her lose and someone else's gain.
No comments:
Post a Comment